{"product_id":"hardcover-1e-players-handbook-advanced-dungeons-dragons-ad-d-1st-edition","title":"HARDCOVER 1E Players Handbook Advanced Dungeons \u0026 Dragons AD\u0026D 1st Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Western;\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e👉\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis HARDCOVER reprint is an unread casewrap bound copy that is made to order. Any foldout maps (if any) that were included in the original print are separated and bound all together as 8.5 x 11 inch pages.\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Western;\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e👉🏼These reprints are made to order. Please allow 1-2 weeks for your order to ship. A tracking number will be provided when your order ships.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Western;\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e👉🏽\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThese reprints are fully licensed by Wizards of the Coast and printed on demand from original edition scans or digital files (if available). Please allow 1-2 weeks for your order to ship. A tracking number will be provided when your order ships.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"color: #333333;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Western;\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003e👉🏾All orders are packaged safely in boxes for shipping.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan\u003e👉🏿\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAll books ship for FREE and thus have FREE combined shipping!\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cspan\u003e📧\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePlease get in touch if you want a particular title! TSR, WOTC, R. Talsorian, Space Frontiers and more are available!\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe 1st Edition Player's Handbook is back!\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo more searching through stacks of books and magazines to find out what you need to know. The Player's Handbook puts it all at your fingertips, including: All recommended character classes: Fighters, Paladins, Rangers, Magic-Users, and more.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCharacter Races: Dwarves, Elves, Gnomes, Half-Orcs, Humans, and more.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCharacter Level Statistics.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEquipment lists with costs.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpell listings by level and descriptions of effects (including many new spells!).\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a dungeon adventurer or Dungeon Master, you will find the contents of this book to be what you have been waiting for. All useful material is now compiled under one cover, especially for players!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNote about the Print edition:\u003c\/strong\u003e While this book is black \u0026amp; white, it was printed using the Standard Heavyweight \"color\" option for better quality paper.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduct History\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e (1978), by Gary Gygax, was the first book of rules for the AD\u0026amp;D game. It was published in June 1978 and seen by many for the first time at Gen Con XI (August 1978).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAbout the Cover.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The cover by Dave Trampier — which shows adventurers looting an idol after killing their foes — is one of the most famous in D\u0026amp;D history. The painting actually encompasses the back cover too (as was the case with all of the original AD\u0026amp;D books) but that picture, which shows adventurers dragging off loot and foes, has never received the same attention.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecause of its fame, Trampier's cover has been repeatedly recreated and parodied. The 3.5e \u003ci\u003ePlayer's Handbook II\u003c\/i\u003e (2006), which shows a close-up of the idol-robbing, may be the most attractive homage, but the original \u003ci\u003eHackMaster Player's Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e (2001) is fun too, because it shows Trampier's iconic scene several minutes earlier, when the adventurers are still fighting the lizard monsters.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTrampier's famous cover was replaced in 1983 by a Jeff Easley painting of a wizard. Most people agree that the later image is more professional, but much less memorable.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAbout the Other Illustrations.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The illustrations by Dave Trampier and David C. Sutherland III feel relatively scant, especially when compared to the 200 illustrations in the \u003ci\u003eMonster Manual\u003c\/i\u003e (1977). There also aren't as many iconic illustrations as found in the other two core AD\u0026amp;D books. However, the illustration for Otto's Irresistible Dance is a favorite. It shows an Umber Hulk clicking his heels together while under the influence of the spell — which underlines the use of humorous cartoons in early AD\u0026amp;D products.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAbout the Title.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e There is no apostrophe in the title of the original \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e. This was purposeful. Its usage was considered confusing and graphically unattractive, and so none of the 1st edition (1e) books had apostrophes in their titles. In \u003ci\u003eDragon #28\u003c\/i\u003e (August 1979), TSR Manager of Designers Allan Hammack, bemoaned its loss, saying \"Alas for the death of the apostrophe!\" and \"Using an artistic excuse, they bar its every attempt at propriety and propagate the error. All is not lost, however, for there is a small but determined underground seeking to restore the lost mark to its proper place. Someday ... .\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThat day would be the 1989 release of AD\u0026amp;D 2e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eMoving Toward AD\u0026amp;D.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The D\u0026amp;D game began with the \u003ci\u003eOD\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e box (1974), which was expanded with four supplements (1975-1976) and additional articles in \u003ci\u003eThe Strategic Review\u003c\/i\u003e (1975-1976). However, by the time that \u003ci\u003eSupplement III: Eldritch Wizardry\u003c\/i\u003e (1976) was published, TSR had already decided that the system — which now spanned a half dozen books and several newsletters — needed to be unified and cleaned up.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA new \u003ci\u003eBasic D\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e (1977) came out first, thanks to the singular efforts of J. Eric Holmes, but it was just an introductory book, intended to shepherd new players through the first three levels of play. What D\u0026amp;D really needed was a revamped game for the more advanced players: \u003ci\u003eAdvanced Dungeons \u0026amp; Dragons\u003c\/i\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ci\u003eAD\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e system technically began with \u003ci\u003eMonster Manual\u003c\/i\u003e (1977) in December 1977. This compendium of monsters showed off the increased detail that would be present in the new AD\u0026amp;D game, but it didn't give much hint at the game mechanics. That would await the publication of the AD\u0026amp;D \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e (1978) six months later.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDespite the publication of AD\u0026amp;D, Gygax claimed that the original \"D\u0026amp;D will always be with us\". He thought that OD\u0026amp;D and AD\u0026amp;D served different audiences, and that there was no reason to retire the original. OD\u0026amp;D did indeed remain available into the '80s. Afterward, later editions of Basic D\u0026amp;D (1981, 1983) picked up the mantle of OD\u0026amp;D as the simpler and looser D\u0026amp;D game.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eMany Printings.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e appeared in 17 different printings from 1978 to 1990. The last few printings actually appeared after the release of the AD\u0026amp;D 2e \u003ci\u003ePlayer's Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e (1989) — which shows how much less concerned everyone was about editions in the '80s. It was a far cry from the desperate dumping of 3e products following the release of D\u0026amp;D 3.5e (2003)!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost printings involved very minor variations. The biggest change came with the 8th printing (1983), which was when the new Jeff Easley cover appeared as part of a general rebranding of the AD\u0026amp;D line. In the modern day, the 1e \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e has been reprinted twice more — once in a miniature collectible edition produced under license by Twenty First Century Games (1999), and once in a deluxe limited edition produced by Wizards of the Coast (2012) to support the Gygax memorial fund. The 2012 edition featured reset text.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eA Different Sort of Players Handbook.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The AD\u0026amp;D 1e \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e is very different from its later incarnations. From AD\u0026amp;D 2e onward, the \u003ci\u003ePlayer's Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e has been the main rulebook for the D\u0026amp;D game, but in AD\u0026amp;D 1e it only contained the most crucial rules needed by the players. That means that it explains abilities, races, classes, spells, and psionics, plus a few other bobs and bits.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhat's astonishing is what's \u003ci\u003enot\u003c\/i\u003e in this book. For example, you won't find rules about how to actually roll your abilities! The \u003ci\u003eDungeon Masters Guide\u003c\/i\u003e (1979) has that! Similarly, there are no rules for combat or even saving throws! Instead the player only got summaries of what the rules systems were like — not the actual systems!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThough this might seem bizarre today, the original \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e was from a different age; players were kept in the dark about the rules of the game, and the game master was the ultimate arbiter of all the game's mechanics.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eWhat a Difference an Edition Makes: The Controversy.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e There's a lot of disagreement over whether AD\u0026amp;D is a minor revision of OD\u0026amp;D — gathering together all of its supplements and articles — or whether it's something bigger. This controversy started in \u003ci\u003eDragon #26\u003c\/i\u003e (June 1979) when Gygax rather shockingly said, \"there is no similarity (perhaps even less) between D\u0026amp;D and AD\u0026amp;D than there is between D\u0026amp;D and its various imitators produced by competing publishers.\" In other words, he was claiming that OD\u0026amp;D was more like \u003ci\u003eTunnels \u0026amp; Trolls\u003c\/i\u003e (1975) and \u003ci\u003eRuneQuest\u003c\/i\u003e (1978) than AD\u0026amp;D! He was very clear in saying this: \" It is neither an expansion nor a revision of the old game, it is a new game.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSome folks disagreed, most notably Richard Berg who reviewed the \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e in \u003ci\u003eStrategy \u0026amp; Tactics\u003c\/i\u003e magazine and said that it was a rewrite of the OD\u0026amp;D game. Gygax took extreme umbrage of this claim in \u003ci\u003eDragon #22\u003c\/i\u003e (February 1979), stating:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003e\"Under the circumstances, one can only wonder why Mr. Berg took the time to write on a subject of which he obviously knew so little. Perhaps it is personal or professional jealousy, as the success of D\u0026amp;D and now AD\u0026amp;D has certainly set the rest of the gaming hobby industry on its collective ear, but that is speculation.\"\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fans had the ultimate word: when you examine the RPG magazines of the late '70s and early '80s that most of them didn't differentiate much between OD\u0026amp;D, AD\u0026amp;D, and BD\u0026amp;D. Instead, magazine articles were usually written for \"Dungeons \u0026amp; Dragons\" generally. In the present day, most people would probably still agree that Berg was more correct than Gygax … but it all depends on what you're measuring.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eWhat a Difference an Edition Makes: The Goals.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e There \u003ci\u003eis\u003c\/i\u003e a big difference between OD\u0026amp;D and AD\u0026amp;D, but it primarily lies in the overall vision of the new game. Gygax explained many of his new goals in articles in \u003ci\u003eDragon #26\u003c\/i\u003e (June 1979) and \u003ci\u003eDragon #28\u003c\/i\u003e (August 1979). He said that \"D\u0026amp;D is only a loose structure … [while] AD\u0026amp;D is a much tighter structure which follows, in part, the same format D\u0026amp;D does, but it is a much stronger, more rigid, more extensive framework …\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis tighter framework served three purposes:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFirst, Gygax thought that the tighter framework would keep players from house-ruling D\u0026amp;D. As he explained: \"[O]D\u0026amp;D campaigns can be those which feature comic book spells, 43rd level balrogs as player characters, and include a plethora of trash from various and sundry sources, AD\u0026amp;D cannot be so composed.\" Based on these changes he thought that \"players will not be so able to bend the rules nor will the DM be able to bend the rules.\" This staunch defense of the \"official\" rules of AD\u0026amp;D would lead to letters-column drama throughout the '80s.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecond, Gygax thought that it would create \"a better platform from which to launch major tournaments\" — a goal that was much more successful (and less controversial).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThird, Gygax thought that it would better orient D\u0026amp;D toward its actual audience. OD\u0026amp;D had been intended for miniatures players who already had a strong basis in wargaming. Rules that were sometimes guidelines weren't a problem for these experienced players. Now, D\u0026amp;D's loose structure was becoming a problem for the larger audiences brought into the game though Holmes' \u003ci\u003eBasic D\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e. Gygax believed that a more structured game would better appeal to a large audience made up of \"wargamers, game hobbyists, science fiction and fantasy fans, those who have never read fantasy fiction or played strategy games, young and old, male and female.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eWhat a Difference an Edition Makes: The Mechanics.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e Mechanically, the biggest difference in AD\u0026amp;D lies in its level of detail. Everything is much more specific and much better described. The \u003ci\u003eMonster Manual\u003c\/i\u003e had already made this obvious with its monster descriptions, which were longer and had much more statistics. In the \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e the spell listings (which took up half the book!) showed the same increased level of detail — which now featured not just longer descriptions but also whole new elements, like lists of required spell components.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAD\u0026amp;D also made one other major mechanical change: it increased the breadth of play possible. OD\u0026amp;D play topped out in the first ten levels of play, while AD\u0026amp;D pushed viable play into the teens. As Gygax said, \"you won’t run out of game in six weeks, or six months. Perhaps in six years you will, but that’s a whole different story.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond that, the new \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e mainly gathered material from a variety of sources. For example, the ten character classes in AD\u0026amp;D were massively expanded from the three in OD\u0026amp;D, but most of them had appeared before:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCleric: \u003ci\u003eOD\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e (1974)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDruid: \u003ci\u003eSupplement III: Eldritch Wizardry\u003c\/i\u003e (1976)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFighter: \u003ci\u003eOD\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e (1974)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaladin: \u003ci\u003eGreyhawk\u003c\/i\u003e (1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRanger: \u003ci\u003eThe Strategic Review #2\u003c\/i\u003e (Summer 1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMagic-User: \u003ci\u003eOD\u0026amp;D\u003c\/i\u003e (1974)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIllusionist: \u003ci\u003eThe Strategic Review #4\u003c\/i\u003e (Winter 1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThief: \u003ci\u003eGreat Plains Game Players Newsletter #9\u003c\/i\u003e (June 1974) \/ \u003ci\u003eSupplement I: Greyhawk\u003c\/i\u003e (1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAssassin: \u003ci\u003eSupplement II: Blackmoor\u003c\/i\u003e (1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMonk: \u003ci\u003eSupplement II: Blackmoor\u003c\/i\u003e (1975)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bard class (which appears in an appendix) was a bit more of an innovation; though a bard had previously appeared in \u003ci\u003eThe Strategic Review vol. 2 #1\u003c\/i\u003e (February 1976), the AD\u0026amp;D bard was massively rebalanced — and largely considered unplayable, since it required moving through fighter and thief classes before finally arriving at druidic bardism.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAD\u0026amp;D also increased the list of possible PC races, which were limited to dwarves, elves, hobbits, and men in OD\u0026amp;D. Now the list of demihumans was doubled, with half-elves from \u003ci\u003eSupplement I: Greyhawk\u003c\/i\u003e (1975), gnomes from \u003ci\u003eSupplement II: Blackmoor\u003c\/i\u003e (1975) and the totally new half-orcs.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond that, there were numerous small changes, such as: alignments were now ninefold, expanding from the five alignments found in \u003ci\u003eThe Strategic Review vol. 2 #1\u003c\/i\u003e (February 1976); all classes now got bonuses from strength and dexterity, not just fighters; and various mechanics were re-balanced as part of a more cohesive whole.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eWhoops!\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e was a small production from a small company and it had a fair number of errors in it. \u003ci\u003eDragon Magazine #35\u003c\/i\u003e (March 1980) lists many of them, but surprisingly most of those errors were never fixed in later editions of the actual book. The funniest error in the book is probably the listing of the class title for fifth level clerics as \"perfects\" — which was presumably a typo for \"prefects\". This mistake was cut out of the \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e starting with the third printing (1979) or so, leaving 5th level cleric as the only level in AD\u0026amp;D without a level title.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe most far-reaching error in the \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e, according to Frank Mentzer in \u003ci\u003eDragon #70\u003c\/i\u003e (February 1983), was the idea that falling damage was just 1d6 for every ten feet fallen. Apparently Gygax had written “1d6 per 10’ for each 10’ fallen”, implying damage that cumulatively increased, but someone had changed it to “1d6 for each 10’ fallen”. Gygax only realized the mistake while producing the thief-acrobat class for \u003ci\u003eDragon #69\u003c\/i\u003e (January 1983). However, after almost a decade of non-cumulative falling damage, it was almost impossible to get Mentzer's change to stick.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMore errors appeared with the publication of the \u003ci\u003eDungeon Masters Guide\u003c\/i\u003e (1979). Because so much time elapsed between the two publications, they ended up being out of sync with each other. The most notable change was probably that the monk went from using the thief attack table in the \u003ci\u003ePHB\u003c\/i\u003e to the the cleric attack table in the \u003ci\u003eDMG\u003c\/i\u003e, however there were other discrepancies between the books. Some were addressed in the \"Dispel Confusions\" columns of the later issues of TSR UK's \u003ci\u003eImagine\u003c\/i\u003e magazine.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eExpanding the Outer Planes.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The D\u0026amp;D Outer Planes appeared for the first time in \"Planes: The Concepts of Spatial, Temporal and Physical Relationships in D\u0026amp;D\", an article by Gary Gygax for \u003ci\u003eThe Dragon #8\u003c\/i\u003e (July 1977). \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e reprints the \u003ci\u003eDragon\u003c\/i\u003e planes in largely the same form. There are 25 total, including the prime, positive, and negative material planes, four elemental planes, the ethereal plane, the astral plane, and 16 outer planes.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Great Wheel was born!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eFuture History.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e The entire roleplaying world was in a strange hiatus between the publication of AD\u0026amp;D 1e's \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e (June 1978) and \u003ci\u003eDungeon Masters Guide\u003c\/i\u003e (August 1979). During this interim, TSR began publishing official AD\u0026amp;D products, such as the original \"G\" adventures (1978), but there were no AD\u0026amp;D rules to play then with! To help resolve this issue, TSR published an \u003ci\u003eemergency sneak preview\u003c\/i\u003e of AD\u0026amp;D rules in \u003ci\u003eDragon #22\u003c\/i\u003e (February 1979), but for the rest of AD\u0026amp;D's rules, players had to wait another six months.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis wait between the books does not appear to have been planned. At one time, Gygax was talking about \u003ci\u003eboth\u003c\/i\u003e books appearing in summer of 1978. This suggests that the intent was to have no gap … let alone a gap of 14 months! The problem was in part caused by Gygax needing a break after the complex ruleswork of the \u003ci\u003ePlayers Handbook\u003c\/i\u003e; he wrote the \"D\" adventures (1978) as a break before moving on to the \u003ci\u003eDungeon Masters Guide\u003c\/i\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAbout the Creators.\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e Gygax was the co-creator of D\u0026amp;D alongside Dave Arneson, but the AD\u0026amp;D books would only bear his name … a point that led to legal contention in 1979.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Chaos Lord Games","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47290700464322,"sku":"XnM-695-3d","price":52.45,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0741\/0591\/3538\/files\/s-l1600_b43113d7-e194-44dc-bfba-90457ee9c4f0.png?v=1774705424","url":"https:\/\/chaoslordgames.com\/products\/hardcover-1e-players-handbook-advanced-dungeons-dragons-ad-d-1st-edition","provider":"Chaos Lord Games","version":"1.0","type":"link"}